Mapping locals and tourists by photo tags

I have been following San Francisco's own "digital cartographer" Eric Fischer for awhile now, so I'm a bit surprised that I just found this set on his Flickr photostream. In 2010 Fischer presented a series of maps that documented the intensity of geo-tagged photography in over a hundred metro regions around the world. In his updated set he breaks this information down a bit further, into 'tourists' and 'locals' - users/photographers that uploaded multiple photos of the area more than a months apart.

The project was initially an effort to see if the earlier Geotaggers' World Atlas maps were primarily sourced by tourist photography, but the product became a veritable GIS map comparing trending tourist activity to areas where local residents spend their time.

Washington, District of Columbia

District Parks Divided, or "Occupy protesters vs. land use planning"

Is your local park locally or federally owned? I'm willing to bet that most of you have never really considered this question. For most people around the country there is no reason to (except for in places like the Presidio in SF, which is still a national park with apartments and storefronts in it). But jurisdiction over DC's parks is split between the federal government - specifically the National Park Service who manages them and the Architect of the Capital that plans and designs them - and DC local government. This has two important implications. The first is an issue of finance; since Washington government does not own the land or the structures on the property, it does not see any revenue generated from vendors/tourism and it cannot leverage them as collateral assets in financial planning (i.e. bonds, loans, credit ratings, etc). It might sound crazy to leverage a park or recreation area on a public loan, but it's actually pretty common and most local governments have many other tools for managing repayment issues so that they don't actually give up the property in a pinch.

But the second is a bit more interesting from a public interest perspective. This disparity was recently exemplified during the Occupy DC protest when - after several months of sit/lie ins in McPherson Square and other parks - District residents overwhelmingly supported the removal of long-term encampments. Despite Washington's overwhelmingly left-leaning political culture and recognition that Occupy had made its point, residents wanted use of their parks back. But there was one simple problem: DC government did not have jurisdiction over the parks.

Home designs for humanitarian crises, or "What do IDPs and hipsters have in common?"

A friend at school asked for a book suggestion last December as part of her effort to find the perfect Christmas present for her architecture and development inclined SO. By chance, I actually had a book on hand for exactly this situation! Architecture for Humanity collected information on dozens of innovative, low-cost, "sustainable" designs for habitable structures back in 2006 and featured them in a handbook called Design Like You Give a Damn.

Someone had bought it, presumably used it, and discarded it at the end of my freshman year of college at Santa Clara. After haggling with the book-nazi in the basement of our student center (not the nice gray-haired woman, the other old guy that didn't smile) to sell back my calculus text for more than $10 - and failing - I found this gem on the FREE table. It was brilliant. I read the book cover to cover and shared it with a few people, and I wound up working on our school's Solar Decathlon team the next year because I thought the whole idea was so nifty. After suggesting the book I read through it again, and I've been following their work for the past few months.

Economic inequality and development, or "This is where Occupy should have started"

I have spent a lot of time graphing Lorenz curves. It's a requirement of getting my degree. I hated drawing distributions of income/land/wealth and working out the calculations and derivatives by hand, but in retrospect this practice seriously matured my academic understanding of the effects of economic inequality (especially radical inequality) on the overall well-being and economic efficiency of a society. Greater inequality reduces domestic consumption, decreases political participation and representation, increases statutory penalties and abuses of police power, inhibits the accumulation of human capital necessary for advanced production and services, etc etc. All of these things are clearly established correlations, and many of them have substantial data to support causal relationships.

You can maybe imagine then, how strange it is to turn this critical perspective back onto the United States. Instead of starting with "greater inequality reduces well-being and economic performance" and "what can we do about it", domestic political conversations have to begin with a tedious explanation of why treating "economic inequality" is not the same thing as "envy of the rich", "commi-socialism" and "class warfare".

Employment in Washington, or "The intern phenomenon"

Forbes published an article in its online magazine this morning that ranks the top 10 cities for finding employment. Astonishingly, Washington D.C. was listed as #1. (Wow, us!) The Washington Metro Region currently boasts one of the lowest unemployment figures in the country at 5.5%, 2.6 points lower than the national average of 8.1%, and it even experienced a small drop of about .3 this past month.


And yet something doesn't seem to fit. Everywhere I go, I meet or run into people that complain about needing to find 'real work' (me included, full disclosure). And understandably! Most of my otherwise accomplished peers are seriously underpaid. After some digging, I think I've found the cause of everyone's dissonance.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics - which the Forbes rating is based on (5.5%, #1) - 'employment' includes unpaid work >.> :

"The household survey definition of employment comprises wage and salary workers (including domestics and other private household workers), self-employed persons, and unpaid workers who worked 15 hours or more during the reference week" (BLS Explanatory Notes)

Unemployment excludes unpaid, stipend-based, and underpaid positions (below minimum wage, for example) after 15 hours of work per week. For those of you less familiar with the DC labor market, estimates of local "unpaid" and underpaid interns (which fluctuate by season) are consistently between 20,000 and 40,000 on any given day, and that number skyrockets during non-academic summer terms when student and recent graduates from across the country flood into the District. DC's commercial industries are also very narrow compared to comparable metro-regions and are still largely limited to government and public contracting, telecommunications, computer software and hospitality services.